A Kris Report: Hulk Hogan

You could take this report, take out the name Hulk Hogan and put in Ric Flair and it would be the same thing, yet you say you don't like Rick Flair. In his day Ric Flair was considered the best just like Hulk Hogan was. Before WCW and WWF dominated everything and there where just these regional circuits Ric Flair was "The Guy", and he was considered the best. Hulk Hogan and Ric Flair are the same, except one is older then the other.

Christian wrote:

You could take this report, take out the name Hulk Hogan and put in Ric Flair and it would be the same thing, yet you say you don't like Rick Flair. In his day Ric Flair was considered the best just like Hulk Hogan was. Before WCW and WWF dominated everything and there where just these regional circuits Ric Flair was "The Guy", and he was considered the best. Hulk Hogan and Ric Flair are the same, except one is older then the other.

4 years older, that's nothing. Plus, Ric Flair is desperate and sad, Hulk Hogan isn't, that's the difference between them, Hogan stays in the business for passion, Flair stays in the business for money and fame. Mostly fame.

I actually agree completely with this report. However, I hate Hogan for the fact that he killed TNA as far as I'm concerned, and I cannot forgive him

B00Bz, Hulk Hogan did not kill TNA, Dixie Carter did. Jeff Jarrett pretty much handled everything until he came along, as soon as he did, Carter took over, as much as they hide that.

Yet I have always hated Hogan and Superman as a child. Can't remember why I hated Hogan but I hated Superman because he was so unrealistic and a generic superhero that can do anything, also his face was too long and his eyes were dots.

As I grew up I hated Hogan even more, he always made a fool out of himself and always came off as obnoxious. In fact, Hogan never entertained me, he would always make me rage when he would not sell and do his stupid taunt or whatever, he would make me remember that wrestling is scripted, I know that shit and that is why I want to watch good wrestlers like Shawn Michaels or Batista that make me forget that I'm watching a scripted match and would cause me to mark out. (Yes I said Batista was a good wrestler, if you want to believe the internet fagbags that say he's a botchfest then go ahead."

Shawn The Hobo wrote:

Yet I have always hated Hogan and Superman as a child. Can't remember why I hated Hogan but I hated Superman because he was so unrealistic and a generic superhero that can do anything, also his face was too long and his eyes were dots.

As I grew up I hated Hogan even more, he always made a fool out of himself and always came off as obnoxious. In fact, Hogan never entertained me, he would always make me rage when he would not sell and do his stupid taunt or whatever, he would make me remember that wrestling is scripted, I know that shit and that is why I want to watch good wrestlers like Shawn Michaels or Batista that make me forget that I'm watching a scripted match and would cause me to mark out. (Yes I said Batista was a good wrestler, if you want to believe the internet fagbags that say he's a botchfest then go ahead."

I agree with Batista being an excellent Wrestler. Calling Hulk Hogan non-entertaining, is though, wrong. He might not be interesting to watch wrestle post-98, but before that, he was great, he put a match on for BOTH competitors and not just himself, unlike Ric Flair who completely buried Carlito instead of hyping him.

Chris Jericho wrote:

I agree with Batista being an excellent Wrestler. Calling Hulk Hogan non-entertaining, is though, wrong. He might not be interesting to watch wrestle post-98, but before that, he was great, he put a match on for BOTH competitors and not just himself, unlike Ric Flair who completely buried Carlito instead of hyping him.

You raise a good point, however as a child I never witnessed much of Hogan pre-98, as I used to watch WWF and not WCW. So what I saw of Hogan I did not like, Hogan may be an entertainer but certainly not to me. For the record, I can't stand Ric Flair.

Shawn The Hobo wrote:

Chris Jericho wrote:

I agree with Batista being an excellent Wrestler. Calling Hulk Hogan non-entertaining, is though, wrong. He might not be interesting to watch wrestle post-98, but before that, he was great, he put a match on for BOTH competitors and not just himself, unlike Ric Flair who completely buried Carlito instead of hyping him.

You raise a good point, however as a child I never witnessed much of Hogan pre-98, as I used to watch WWF and not WCW. So what I saw of Hogan I did not like, Hogan may be an entertainer but certainly not to me. For the record, I can't stand Ric Flair.

Ric Flair is just sad, he's the one trying to have matches, Hogan wants to stay in the business, I say good for him. Ric Flair wants more fame, because he's sad and desperate.

Turns out it's not too long to read. I agree wish Mashiash.